Analytical Research and Sources Archive (AR&SA)
Sources/Historical reports and investigations

King-Crane Commission Report (1919)
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1919Parisv12/d380 https://content.ecf.org.il/files/M00708_KingCraneReportTextEnglish.pdf
US commission dispatched by Woodrow Wilson to survey the wishes of local populations in former Ottoman territories after WWI. Found majority Arab opposition to Zionist immigration and large-scale land transfer. Recommended limiting Jewish immigration and abandoning a Jewish state. The report was suppressed by the US government and not published until 1922.

Key use: shows Western powers had direct documented evidence of Arab opposition to Zionist settlement as early as 1919, before partition proposals existed.


Shaw Commission Report (1929)
https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/1460 https://britainpalestineproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/shaw-commission-reducedpdf_compressed-1.pdf https://www.palquest.org/en/historictext/21720/report-shaw-commission-al-buraq-western-wall-disturbances-august-1929
British investigation into the 1929 Arab riots and massacres, including the Hebron massacre. Found that Arab violence was triggered by fear of Jewish immigration and land displacement, not solely by religious incitement. Recommended limits on Jewish immigration and land purchases.

Key use: British government's own commission attributed Arab violence to political and economic fear of displacement, not inherent antisemitism alone.


Hope-Simpson Report (1930)
https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/1461 https://www.un.org/unispal/document/auto-insert-194707/
Economic investigation commissioned after the 1929 riots. Found that Jewish land purchases were causing the displacement of Arab tenant farmers and contributing to Arab unemployment. Concluded there was insufficient cultivable land in Palestine to absorb both large-scale Jewish immigration and the existing Arab agricultural population.

Key use: British economic analysis directly linking Jewish land acquisition to Arab dispossession, predating the partition debate.


Peel Commission Report (1937)
https://ecf.org.il/media_items/290 https://www.palquest.org/en/historictext/6719/peel-commission-report https://jewishvirtuallibrary.org/text-of-the-peel-commission-report
British Royal Commission proposing the first formal partition plan for Palestine. Concluded that the Arab and Jewish national aspirations were irreconcilable under a single administration and recommended dividing the territory into separate states. Acknowledged that partition would require the transfer of Arab populations from the proposed Jewish state.

Key use: the first official recognition by the British government that the two populations could not coexist under a single political structure. Confirms the conflict was national, not merely religious.


British White Paper (1939)
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/brwh1939.asp https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/955 https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1939v04/d811
British policy document severely restricting Jewish immigration to 75,000 over five years and limiting Jewish land purchase. Proposed an independent Palestinian state within ten years with an Arab majority. Rejected by both the Zionist leadership and Arab leadership for opposite reasons.

Key use: shows Britain actively suppressed Jewish immigration during the Holocaust period and attempted to guarantee Arab demographic majority, directly contradicting narratives of unconditional British support for Zionism.


Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry (1946)
https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/453 https://content.ecf.org.il/files/M00317_AngloAmericanCommitteeReport.pdf https://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/angpre.asp
Joint British and US investigation into the future of Palestine and the status of Jewish Holocaust survivors in Europe. Recommended immediate admission of 100,000 Jewish refugees into Palestine and rejected both an exclusively Arab and exclusively Jewish state. Supported a binational solution under UN trusteeship.

Key use: joint Western commission explicitly connected Jewish refugee crisis to Palestine policy while simultaneously rejecting Jewish statehood, showing the contradictions inside Allied policy.


UNSCOP Report (1947)
https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/703295?v=pdf https://www.palestine-studies.org/en/node/1656507 https://ecf.org.il/issues/issue/454
UN Special Committee on Palestine report recommending partition into separate Arab and Jewish states with Jerusalem under international administration. Majority plan formed the basis for UN Resolution 181. Arab states and Palestinian leadership rejected the plan entirely. Jewish Agency accepted it.

Key use: the partition plan the Arab side rejected was a UN recommendation, not a unilateral imposition by a single power. Useful for burden-of-proof arguments on who rejected a two-state outcome first.


0 backlinks0 words0 characters